from Inquiry, Volume 5, Number 2, Fall 2000
© Copyright 2000 Virginia Community College System
Abstract
Three VCCS faculty members share their experiences while participating in the VaCIE-CEMP Exchange.
The
VaCIE-CEMP Exchange is an international faculty/staff exchange involving the
VCCS and its counterparts from England, Wales, Northern Ireland, the Republic
of Ireland, and the Netherlands. VaCIE (pronounced Vay-see) stands for the
Virginia Council for International Education and CEMP is the Cheshire
Educational Management Programme. VaCIE coordinates the American end of the
program under the leadership of Becky Thomas, French professor at Piedmont
Virginia Community College. The purpose of the exchange is to:
§
study another country's
educational system,
§
learn what kind of
teaching and learning techniques they use,
§
examine similarities
and differences in the student bodies, and
§
expand cultural
horizons and broaden understanding of other societies.
Individuals
are usually paired with others in their own discipline, as they will have the
most to share, but delegates are sometimes matched by similar outside
interests. This exchange has been going on for approximately 6 years and
originally involved only the British jurisdictions. The exchange is
extraordinarily worthwhile (and inexpensive) because delegates visit a
comparable institution and stay in each other's homes. Consequently, the cost
to the college is little more than airfare. European delegates visit in October
for two weeks and American delegates make their return visit in May just after
finals. The academic benefits are extensive, and where else would you have a
chance to bike through Rotterdam and sample Dutch pastries? Drink British ale
and eat superb Indian food? Or ascend the faux Eiffel Tower at the tacky beach
resort of Blackpool on the Irish Sea?
British Sixth Form Colleges
A
sixth form college is part of the further education system in the UK and is
their closest equivalent to a community college. In Britain one attends school
through age 16, which is “school leaving age.” Students who wish further study
then apply for admission to a sixth form college, which offers a core of
academic programs similar to our own, as well as offering occupational programs
in Travel & Leisure, Information Technology, Cosmetology, etc. Some
students will complete their education at this level, which is less common than
formerly (two decades ago only 20% felt the need for additional education).
From there a student can apply to one of the approximately 80 universities in Britain.
Thus college and university are not equivalent terms, as they are in the U.S.,
but rather different levels of education. However, sixth form colleges are
similar to community colleges in that:
§
they are independent of
high schools;
§
they teach at the same
level that we do (two years of advanced study);
§
they offer broad survey
courses in similar disciplines (English, biology, etc.); and
§
a full-time student's
schedule is 15 hours a week (labs additional).
A
major difference is that progress depends almost entirely on performance on
standard exams. To get into university preparation courses at a sixth form
college one must have passed at least five graduation exams from high school.
College then prepares the student for the university entrance exams, which
serve as a graduation equivalent (sixth form colleges don't grant degrees).
Test questions are short answer and essay and are graded by faculty from other
colleges, using common standards (or "mark schemes", as they call
them). The virtues of this system are that grades mean the same thing
regardless of what college a student has attended because national norms are
applied. A similar system is in place at the university system, so grades
actually matter more than which institution a student attended, at least more
so than in America.
The
following personal narratives by NVCC VaCIE participants further indicate the
similarities and differences not only among American and European undergraduate
colleges but among the European colleges as well.
Halton
College
In May 1998, I (Cathy
Sabol) visited Halton College (http://www.haltoncollege.ac.uk) in
Cheshire, England for one week. My exchange partner, Kathleen Gaffey, a
computer lecturer, described Halton as “a community college with approximately
12,000 (headcount) students. It believes in a technological future and is
committed to developing new courses in areas such as multimedia, virtual
reality, and the Internet. The college is also involved in developing new methods
of curriculum delivery and presently delivers numerous courses by
videoconferencing.”
My
experience with Halton’s faculty and facilities bore out its emphasis on
technology: numerous and readily available PCs and Macintoshes, color
laserwriters, Apple laptops for staff use, video streaming via the UNIX server,
and virtual reality courses. On the
other hand, the Halton library had been excluded from this technology banquet.
The library was allocated just two Dolphin computers, one for the circulation
system and the other for the Lexicon online catalog, which could not be
accessed from other campus sites. Internet access, available to students and
community users in the college’s Learning Centre, was, in 1998, not a part of
their library services. I wasn’t sure if I was seeing a library of the dim past
(an outdated archive) or of the imprudent future (an under-funded
afterthought).
In
the workforce development arena, Halton shone, with its Small and Medium
Enterprise Centre (SME) targeting manufacturing and engineering businesses with
fewer than 250 employees. About 400 companies were registered with SME and 250
microbusinesses. The Centre offered engineering and electrical simulations,
computer interactivity on health and safety, CADD, National Vocational
Qualifications (NVQ) workshops, virtual reality training, robotics, computer
assisted machinery, and computer hardware repair, all incorporating the same
equipment used by private companies.
As
for Halton’s funding, the Further Education Funding Council provides 75-85% of
the college’s income and the Local Education Authority provides some money to
fund non-academic courses such as flower arranging. Some income is derived by
teaching short courses for industry, offering consulting services, and renting
college facilities. The college also has a revenue stream through Media Vault,
an independent corporation on campus. In addition, the Training Enterprise
Council funds training of students in skills in short supply and the European
Union grants funds for “areas of industrial decline” such as Halton’s service
area.
Other observations worth noting:
§
In Halton’s Key Skills Centre, all first-year, full-time students spent one hour with an
instructor and two hours of independent computer practice learning Microsoft
Office, CV Writer, STAR 2010 (a Canadian integrated learning system for
literacy and numeracy), Netscape Navigator, and Key Typing Tutor.
§
The Languages Unit at
Halton offered six different languages (French, German, Spanish, Italian,
Greek, and Arabic) to students with differing needs (academic qualifications,
holiday purposes, business needs, vocational needs, and learning disabilities)
at a variety of sites (college, local libraries, community centers), using the
most appropriate modes of delivery (traditional, computer based, or
videoconferencing to students in other countries).
§
Keeping faculty and
staff up to speed on technology at Halton was a continuous process and was
handled by a full-time staff development officer.
§
Much of what I observed
reflected a typical American community college, and yet everyone always
appeared to be “teaching to the test” so that their students would pass the
General National Vocational Qualifications (GVNQ) or the General Certificate of
Secondary Education (GCSE) or some other standard, changing the focus of the
classroom and leaving little leeway for experimentation or electives.
§
Some of Halton’s
challenges included new initiatives such as a pilot project in modern
apprenticeships, preparing students for instructional technology (critical for
life skills), “mass customization” (coping with large numbers of students while
individualizing by using computer software such as CourseInfo), Web curriculum
delivery, a greater diversity of students, more commercial links with the
industrial community, and the college serving as facilitator of local
problems/interest groups/community.
One
of the rewards of being a visiting faculty member in a foreign college was the
immersion into the host’s daily life and favorite pastimes. What other
opportunity would I have had to:
·
dine in Halton
College’s student-run restaurant?
Gateway
College
In May 2000 I (Craig Cowden) visited Gateway College
in Leicester, which is in the English Midlands, and was paired with Lesley
McDonough, a psychology instructor. Leicester is a medium-sized city whose
economy was formerly based on textile manufacture, though that has declined
substantially. Gateway College is well known for its psychology program, which
supports four full time faculty, making it the largest program in the college.
The campus and faculty sizes are similar to many community colleges although
the college is in a center city location (see http://www.gateway.ac.uk).
While
at Gateway I observed all the psychology faculty teach and also sat in on
English, history, and sociology classes. I attended an Administrative Council
meeting and had interviews with the Principal (read President) of the College
as well as several administrators and their student development staffer.
Overall I was very impressed at the rigor of their coursework with their heavy,
and indeed almost exclusive, emphasis on analysis and application of theory.
Class activities involve repeatedly being asked to problem solve and think
critically to evaluate a psychological study or explain an observed behavior.
Since their courses are two-year programs, they can include what we cover in
PSY 201 and 202 but in greater depth. They are especially thorough in
discussing research methods and statistics, which are very demanding subjects.
Students are involved in two data collection projects, which they also analyze.
I suspect that grade inflation has been kept to a minimum because only 10% of
the Gateway psychology students achieved "A"s, despite a pass rate of
90%, which makes them an unusually successful department.
Unlike
high-tech Halton College, at Gateway overhead projectors were rare, videos were
infrequent, and there were no computers in the classrooms. Their faculty
received e-mail addresses just this year, but are mandated by the government to
establish IT components to all courses in the fall 2000 semester. They are
frankly unprepared for this challenge, as computers for faculty are limited and
they have had none of the training in which the VCCS has invested so heavily.
There
was little sign of the group work that is so much the rage in America
currently, and there are no term papers. Students might write one to three page
responses to previous test questions as homework, but writing term papers is
not part of their system. There was also no talk of learning styles or learning
disabilities, though it's possible that this was just a chance omission.
I
went on this exchange hoping to learn something about how to teach critical
thinking, and I came away with many ideas and approximately 12 previous exam
questions that they use for practice in the classroom. I was very satisfied
with this portion of my mission and will use those in my classes this year. My
second goal was to see how they were using technology, and this was a
disappointment as this particular college was behind the VCCS in computer
development. Providing every UK faculty/staff member a computer is still a
dream for which there is no funding. This exchange has stoked my interest in
teaching cross-cultural psychology, which has increasing relevance in this
multicultural age.
The exchange was incredibly valuable for seeing how
different the two systems are. It was amazing on return to read stories in the Washington
Post questioning whether students should have to pass the SOLs to graduate,
when such a system is completely accepted in the UK and Commonwealth countries
such as New Zealand and Sri Lanka. Gateway faculty and students were amazed
that I create my own syllabus, write my own tests, and give my own grades. All
of that is standardized and nationalized, and faculty follow a course plan
designed by a central bureaucracy. While fitting into such a system would be
like putting on a straightjacket for an American used to more freedom, I think
that there is a substantial advantage in having ambitious national exams that
students must pass to proceed. Every American faculty member has probably
despaired over students who work very little and attempt to wheedle a better
grade out of the instructor at the end of the semester. This is impossible in
the British system, and their standardized test grades become part of their
permanent record. For example, certain jobs require successful completion of
two or three such exams.
Here are some general observations:
§
Students were younger
than at NVCC but seemed as mature (though lateness to class was common, as it
is here).
§
Evening and weekend
classes exist but are minimal. The same is true for clubs and evening
activities.
§
The college does not
require purchase of textbooks, so a large part of the library collection is
just this, and the photocopying expenses are immense.
§
Using e-mail for newsletters
or announcements has not started there yet—it's just too new.
§
International exchanges
are much more common, and involve Slovakia, France, and Italy, as well as the
United States. Last year 47% of the British population traveled to another
country, so they are much more international.
§
Minority populations
are different, with the Indian subcontinent very heavily represented (and in
other colleges, Chinese or Afro-Caribbeans).
§
Psychology instruction
seemed rather old-fashioned in that it referred to theories and researchers
from the 1970s or earlier. This is in accordance with national syllabi, so is
not merely true of Gateway. There is very little of the neuroscience that has
become ascendant in American psychology.
§
Home stays provide a
much more thorough understanding of a country than just visiting it, because
you can see the patterns of daily life and how they interconnect. I had visited
the UK before but learned immeasurably more this time.
The Dutch ROC System
As in Britain, the Netherlands has a system of local
colleges that fall between secondary education and the university system called
ROCs, which stands for Regionaal Opleidingen Centrum or Regional Training
Centres. ROCs offer a range of programs in vocational and adult education
including programs for young people who have just completed their secondary
education as well as basic adult education and secondary general adult
education. Courses at ROCs are in four main sectors: Technics (engineering and
laboratory), Trade/Commerce/Catering and Hospitality Services, Health Care, and
basic and general Adult Education. ROCs offer courses in many different
locations, some having only one building and specializing in one subject area
such as medical laboratory skills. A student in the Dutch educational system
has many choices, which are described at the Ministry of Education, Culture and
Science's website, www.minocw.nl/english.
Vocational education courses can be taken only after a student has completed secondary
education. At an ROC, the student is at the middle vocational level and can go
on after two or more years to the upper vocational level. Both of these levels
link theoretical classes with working experiences. To study at the university level, the student would require a
pre-university education at the secondary level or an upper vocational diploma.
ROCs
are also responsible for running a compulsory social integration program for
immigrants. They must learn Dutch and receive other training to help them
adjust to the Dutch way of life. Immigrants are primarily from Morocco, Turkey,
Suriname (a former Dutch colony), and various Eastern European countries, such
as Poland, Bosnia, Georgia, and Ukraine.
ROC Zadkine
I
(Marian Delmore) arrived in Rotterdam, the Netherlands on May 14, 2000, to
begin my two-week exchange program with Anja Bierman, a German language
instructor and counselor. As I talked with Anja's family and took a walking
tour of Capelle aan den IJssel, the small town near Rotterdam where she lives
and teaches, I realized how much the home stay adds to the program. It promotes
friendship and collegiality, and really gives the visitor insight into cultural
as well as educational aspects of a country.
My exchange program at ROC Zadkine (www.rotan.nl/mbo/zadkine) was a wonderful
educational experience in learning about higher education in a ROC. Several
faculty members from the ROC Zadkine arranged a lively educational and cultural
program for the five visiting delegates from American community colleges. We
participated in many activities as a group and had many opportunities for
discussions. We spent one morning talking with administrative staff at the
Central Headquarters in Rotterdam, discussing current and future education
issues such as multicultural education and technology's effect on education and
the work force. We observed classes at the Capelle aan den IJssel campus, and
we were participants in a class to give us a first-hand experience in learning
how students from another country are introduced to the Dutch language. We also
visited a medical laboratory site in Rotterdam followed by a visit with a
student doing an internship at the Rotterdam Zoo’s laboratory, where he worked
with the breeding and animal health testing programs. We visited a school site
in Schoonhoven where students learned clock making and worked with silver and
other precious metals in jewelry design. We walked through the small town
afterwards and saw some of the sites where students were placed for
internships, and we ended the day by visiting the instructor’s home.
All
of our experiences seemed to combine a professional experience with a friendly
personal tone as we got to know our Dutch colleagues. We had a delicious dinner
prepared by the students in the Catering/Hospitality program at the small,
student-operated ROC Zadkine Culinair, which is open to the public. Our
cultural activities included a walking tour of Rotterdam to study the varied
pre-and post World War II architecture, a historical tour of Rotterdam, a tour
of the Rotterdam Harbor (the world’s largest port), and an excursion to
Amsterdam.
As a librarian, I was interested in the library
system as well. The ROCs that we visited had small collections covering the
subject area that the ROC specialized in, such as laboratory technology.
Students used the public libraries for their assignments. The two public
libraries that I visited had large collections and a very helpful staff. I also
arranged a visit at the Erasmus University library in Rotterdam, a large
university with a library that offers its students the latest developments in
technology (www.eur.nl/ub).
Here
are some miscellaneous observations:
§
Our Dutch colleagues at
the ROC Zadkine have a wonderful knowledge of history. Whether we were visiting
the Church of the Pilgrims or a Cubist-style apartment complex, they could give
us background and many interesting details.
§
I really enjoyed the
sense of humor and good nature of the Dutch people. They made the U.S.
delegates feel very welcome. We exchanged many cards and e-mail addresses.
§
Interestingly, at the
main Rotterdam public library, patrons pay 1 guilder (50 cents/U.S.) to use the
Internet. A coin box is at each computer terminal where the Internet can be
accessed (a pay system was also observed in Derby, England).
§
As we visited classes,
the students were friendly and very talkative. The English language is widely
spoken, allowing us to have in-depth discussions with the students.
§
Delicious pastries
always accompanied morning and afternoon coffee. Cafes are common in Rotterdam
as well as in small towns.
§
The sense of history
was pervasive as we walked along the old canals and wended our way though the
small streets to the University of Leiden, founded in 1575. A nice bonus was
the chance to talk to exuberant students who had just finished taking a final
exam at Sint-Pieterskerk. The National Museum of Antiquities was a special
surprise.
§
I enjoyed hearing the
Rotterdam Philharmonic Orchestra at the De Doelen Concert Hall, which has
wonderful acoustics. And ironically the guest conductor for that performance
was from the United States.
Conclusion
The
benefits of our exchanges were both academic and personal. The colleges of both
countries deal with many of the same issues as we do, such as teaching both
teen-agers and adult students and making education accessible to all. As heavy
industry is replaced by knowledge industries, greater pressure is placed on
colleges to ensure student success. The architecture and age of buildings is
impressive in Britain and the Netherlands, and the city centers are much more
vital than in America. While Europeans complain about shopping malls being the
bane of the high street, the amount of downtown shopping traffic in Europe is
amazing to American eyes. They mourn the introduction of superstores such as
Safeway or Ikea, but one small town contained 5 butchers and 5 bakers in a
single mile. Public transportation is ubiquitous and easy to use, with both
metro and train service far more extensive than in the U.S. Finally, our
exchange partners were warm and gracious and we consider them lifelong friends.
The VaCIE-CEMP exchange is an experience of a lifetime for VCCS faculty who
want to extend their horizons.
Correspondence
concerning this article should be addressed to Craig R. Cowden, Northern
Virginia Community College, 6901 Sudley Road, Manassas, VA 20109. Electronic mail may be sent via Internet
to ccowden@nv.cc.va.us.
Craig Cowden is Professor of Psychology at the Manassas campus of Northern Virginia Community College where Cathy Sabol is Director of Learning Resources. Marian Delmore is a Reference and Instructional Services Librarian at the Annandale campus of NVCC.