from VCCA Journal, Volume 8, Number 1, Summer 1993, 4-10
© Copyright 1993 VCCA Journal
"I Was Forced To Think"
-anonymous student comment
True or False: Stephen Crane never saw a battle before he wrote The Red Badge of Courage.
Multiple Choice: In Of Mice and Men, Lenny and George
were
Short Answer: What state is associated with John Steinbeck?
For years I opened my community college Survey of American Literature class with a quiz composed of such questions based on the current reading assignment. I used the quizzes to prompt students to read the assignment prior to class. But I was never comfortable about the kind of information elicited by the quizzes or the message conveyed by this emphasis on trivia, and I thought hard about what I really wanted students to take away from the survey course. They need to remember some specific facts, but these individual threads and slubs of information should be woven into a whole and meaningful fabric.
Another thing that bothered me was the passive role of the students. They didn't do anything with these bits and pieces of information except memorize them. I wanted them to scrutinize the fragments, to hold them to the light, to compare them and find relationships, to try them on, react to them, and evaluate them. Furthermore, I felt I was under-utilizing the experience that my students bring with them to class. The average age in these community college night classes is around 35, and I thought of the untapped resources sitting there in my classroom drowsy and dormant!
When Lord Fairfax obtained a SCHEV grant for a two-year Thinking-Through-Writing program, I jumped at the opportunity to participate as one of ten faculty members from different disciplines. As a result of working with various consultants and my colleagues, I decided to experiment with a "Thinking-Through-Writing" strategy in my two American literature classes. Each of these classes met one evening a week for three hours, with 30 students in one section and 32 in the other. I wanted to try using informal "think writing" assignments instead of trivia quizzes. I added two journal entries per week to the syllabus, specifying that the entries should be about a page long and that they should be written before coming to class so that we could make use of them in class activities. In order to do the journals, students had to read the assignments carefully and thoughtfully.
In class, I often asked students to read from their journals as a take-off point for class discussion. Sometimes they worked in small groups, reading their writings to each other and pooling them in a report to the class. At the end of each class, I collected the entries and took them home. I read them and wrote responses on them as thoroughly as time permitted, always addressing the content of the writing. I emphasized to the students that these were to be informal, raw "think-writings," and I never marked editing errors in spelling, mechanics, or grammar. I checked the entries off in my grade book and gave credit for them, but I did not grade them.
Here are some examples of the weekly journal assignments:
(2) In what ways can Poe be described as a Romantic?
(3) Copy and discuss a passage from Walden that touched you personally.
(4) "The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock," freewrite for about a page.
(5) How do Eliot and Pound portray the modern world? Is it a nice place to live or even to visit? Point to some specific lines that back up your assessment.
(6) Based on the poems you read, what are the hallmarks of a Frost poem? What characteristic forms, subjects, techniques, and themes would help you to identify a poem as his work?
(7) What is your favorite Frost poem and why do you like it?
(8) Compare and contrast the poetry of W. C. Williams with that of Cummings. What influence do you think Williams' profession had on his work?
(9) (To be done after viewing film on Steinbeck) You are an Okie who has lost the family farm, and you and your family, with all your worldly goods tied onto a Model A ford, are heading for California hoping to find work and a new life. You have stopped for the night. Write an entry in your journal.
(10) After reading the handout on Existentialism, freewrite about it. If there are parts that you don't understand, you are not alone! Try writing about what you don't understand.
(11) The work of Baldwin and Brooks focuses on the black urban scene. What problems do they present? What solutions, if any, do they suggest? Does this material help you to understand current racial tensions in American cities.
The excerpts from student journal entries, noted below, give a variety of perspectives on these questions. To begin, an 18-year-old student responds to question 2; his consideration of it prompts him to speculate about the motives behind the characteristic subject matter and structure of Poe's stories:
Here is an adult student hesitantly writing her way to a better understanding of Eliot's challenging poem. "The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock" (question 4):
In the next entry, a student tackles an affective writing assignment which calls for role-playing based on reading an excerpt from The Grapes of Wrath (question 9):
Another student catches Steinbeck's style in some dialect (question 9):
A student writer creates a setting and uses it to set the mood in a manner reminiscent of Steinbeck himself (question 9):
In the following entry, a student grapples with the concepts of existentialism and articulates a critique of contemporary American ethics (question 10):
These student responses show evidence of careful, thoughtful reading and of several different kinds of critical thinking in progress, including application, analysis based on evidence and inference, drawing conclusions, synthesis, comparison, and evaluation. The entries also show students imaginatively projecting themselves into the literature and relating it to their own experiences.
I was excited about the thoughts and feelings expressed by my students in their journal entries, but I wanted to find out how the students themselves felt about this Thinking-Through-Writing instructional strategy. Accordingly, at the end of the fall semester, I surveyed both classes using an instrument which asked for narrative comments. Then, at the end of the spring semester, I used a survey instrument which called for the same sort of information in a form which could be tabulated as well as providing space for comments.
Of the students surveyed, 100 percent said that the weekly journal entries encouraged them to read the assignment before class. They also said the journal made them read more carefully:
It made me read the material and think about what I read.
The student survey also revealed that 98 percent said the journals encouraged them to think critically about the writing assignment. The survey instrument defined "critical thinking" as "thinking analytically, making connections, noting differences, and making judgements."
The survey also revealed that 92.5 percent said the journals helped them to relate personally to the literature:
Of the students surveyed, 95 percent said the journal entries enhanced their participation in class discussion, and some observed that the class discussion in turn reinforced the journal writing:
For the mid-term and final examinations in the American literature survey courses, I assigned comprehensive take-home essay questions, hoping that these would build on the thinking elicited in the journal entries and class discussions. Here are some examples of the examination questions.
I used my surveys to ask students how they felt about the essay examinations. In answer, 97 percent said the comprehensive take-home essay examinations encouraged critical thinking. Here is a sampling of their comments:
A number of students mentioned feeling more comfortable and less stressed with journals rather than quizzes and with take-home essays rather than tests written in class:
As an instructor, I have been pleased and excited about the results of using Thinking-Through-Writing in American literature classes. The journal entries clearly encouraged students to read their assignments before class and to think critically about the material. Students tended to talk about their own experience both in the journal entries and in the class discussion. The journals fed the class discussion, which in turn helped to prepare students for the comprehensive essay examinations. The course content "felt" more unified and coordinated than it had before, and there was a gratifying amount of cross-referencing between writers, works, and period introductions. One student put it this way: "The journal entries really helped with the reading. The essay tests seemed to finalize the readings and journal entries."
This project has made my teaching more exciting and more satisfying because of the new insights that emerged in the journals, discussions, and essays. I never know what will crop up, and I love that! I definitely do not want my lecture material to come back to me verbatim on the exams. What I want is evidence that the students have read the literature carefully and thought critically about every aspect of the course--reading, audiovisuals, lectures, discussion, and journal and essay writing assignments.
There is certainly room for refinement and improvement of these Thinking-Through-Writing strategies. Some of my journal topics are too general and need to be sharpened and focused. I want to work harder on my written responses in the student journals. Class discussion would be improved by some attention to communication skills--for example, questioning, listening, and summarizing skills. I need to work on my own questioning techniques to refine the class discussion because I think my students are capable of deeper insights and can become more articulate in explaining and defending their ideas.
A number of students complained that the work load of reading and writing was too heavy, and I am going to think carefully about that suggestion. Since I am asking for a higher quality of thinking, it may well be that I need to cut down on the quantity of reading and writing that I require.
As the year progressed, I felt that the classes had developed an atmosphere that was highly conducive to the free expression and exploration of ideas. Most students seemed to feel comfortable speaking up to ask questions and make comments, to say what they liked and what they did not. One student comment described our classroom as "a comfortable yet challenging atmosphere for growth." I attribute this ambiance partly to the establishment of a dialogue that went on as I wrote comments in the journals, as we talked and listened to each other in class, and as the students "talked" to me on their essay exams and I replied with comments and questions. A student commented that she liked the fact that I would sometimes say, "That's a point I had not considered before--that's a very interesting observation." Rather than my being in the position of an authority lecturing from the podium to subordinates, we had become a group of peers working together to explore the rich and wonderful fabric of American literature.
Anne L. Legge is Associate Professor of English at Lord Fairfax Community College in Middletown, Virginia. For twenty years, has taught courses in composition, business writing, American literature, and mass media. She has a B.A. from William and Mary and an M.A. from the University of Virginia.